Plaintiff claimed that the presence of carbon in the client’s aluminum capacitors was proof of patent violation. In order to prove that claim, a slice would have to be taken from the capacitor for examination. A by-product of the slicing process is carbon, making the tests inconclusive.
GRAPHIC #39
In order to establish credibility without being verbose, we visually referenced the source of the highlighted quote.
GRAPHIC #35
To help prove patent infringement, we combined the client’s patent along-side an exploded view of the infringing product. We placed verbiage from the client’s patent to identify components of the product.
GRAPHIC #14
By calling out key elements within the patent we can contain the discussion around pertinent details of the case.
GRAPHIC #9
A PowerPoint build unveiling strategic point after strategic point extracted from two documents.
GRAPHIC #4
This illustration uses callouts to indicate essential responsibilities of the plaintiff’s job.
