GRAPHIC #35

To help prove patent infringement, we combined the client’s patent along-side an exploded view of the infringing product. We placed verbiage from the client’s patent to identify components of the product.

GRAPHIC #34

We needed a chart that clearly allowed us to show the interdependent lineage of claims within the patents. These claim relationships would have been difficult to grasp in non-graphic form.

GRAPHIC #31

This was part of a Markman hearing and explains the nomenclature of genetic breeding.

GRAPHIC #29

This graphic identifies the genetic traces of the client’s patent present in various strains of laboratory mice.

GRAPHIC #28

This timeline highlights milestones in the client’s attempt to halt the sale of an infringing product.

GRAPHIC #27

This was part of a Markman hearing describing how mice are genetically classified and re-classified.

GRAPHIC #26

Multiple pharma patents compete with prior art in the development of a generic equivalent. Prior art has been around for awhile.

GRAPHIC #24

Antagonist meets agonist to create a replica natural ligand.

GRAPHIC #21

The essential steps required to produce the client’s consumer pregnancy stick.

GRAPHIC #14

By calling out key elements within the patent we can contain the discussion around pertinent details of the case.